It's an evangelical experience! Go on, be converted…

Gays

Why the gays love Jesus

As the Holy Week celebrations get underway, our eyes are once more drawn to Rome and the holy show that is made of Easter week. I, for one, have often wondered what is it about religion that attracts gay men? Why also, are gays so drawn to the ranks of Roman Catholic Church, when it despises them in its teachings? These are complicated questions, which require more analysis than I will offer you today. However, considering the evening that’s in it, I will posit a theory.

Why is it that the gays like Jesus so much?

Because he was hung like this.


Saying goodbye to Gay Christmas

In a little under eleven hours time, the last ever curtain shall rise on the Alternative Miss Ireland competition, as 1,200 gays fill the Grand Old Lady of Dame St for the final time, in order to give the AMI a good send off.

This will be AMI XVIII – the eighteenth pageant, although it will mark the 25th anniversary of the staging of the original. (There were no pageants for most of the nineties.) The decision has been taken this year to euthanize the AMI, rather than let it drag on into a painful and prolonged death.

During the good ole days, the show used be a guaranteed sell out and the Olympia would be packed to the gills for the spectacle. However, the problem with having a competition that it is held on a annual basis is that the quality can vary hugely from year to year. Some years saw huge competition between clever, well-matched and well-rehearsed acts who fought it out bitterly for the Shamrock Crown. In other years however, the competition was less compelling and allowed more time “to go the the bar”. This variation in quality created a situation whereby people would go one year and see an amazing show and eagerly attend the following year, only to be disappointed.

Also, I think the recession played its part; with tickets at 30/42 Euro each, the AMI is not a cheap night out. The money all goes to fund HIV and AIDS charities, but still it is pricey in straitened times. So in the context of falling attendances and a show that was becoming maybe a little past its best, the organizers of AMI have decided to put the old girl to sleep this evening.

I think that it is the best thing to do. To my mind, it’s like organizing your own funeral, by inviting all of your friends around for a big party and then slipping off at the end of the night. Tonight we will celebrate the life of the AMI.  We will come to terms with its death when it is no longer around.

The queen is dead. Long live the queen!

For my musings on previous year’s AMI click here.


Rainbow Week I*

*In anticipation of a series of musings upon Trinity Rainbow Week.

Rainbow Week is a campaign run by TCDSU and Q-Soc in order to raise awareness about issues affecting gay people – on a campus where as many as one in ten of the male population identify as “straight”.


Bord na Móna: Get yourself a flamer

The person who posted this unto YouTube, uploaded it with the rather ambiguous comment of “WRONG!”. I think they might be on to something.

Right, where do we begin. This, apparently, is Bord na Móna’s Christmas ad for 2011. It’s wrong on so many levels; not just because it features a rather implausible gay relationship.

Firstly, the acting is unbelievably hammy. The gestures and facial expressions are so large that they could be discerned from the other side of a bog. Secondly, do we actually believe that the son is a gay? Not a chance. Then there’s the actual implausibility of the two of them pairing up. Look at this photo for example:

Here have “David” who is rather good looking. Chiseled. Looks after himself. And “the son”; who recently came second in a Brian Cowen lookalike competition. What, did David take a fancy to him as he saw him throwing up down the front of his jumper outside of Copper Faced Jacks one night? Hmmmm. Likely.

And then there’s the scarf. The David’s-obviously-a-faggot scarf. IT’S AN AD FOR A HEATING PRODUCT. People should not be seen wearing scarves indoors when they are supposedly advertising your heating product. Frankly, that’s just embarrassing.

Then, the scenario of the spare bed is entirely implausible. There are many households in the country where boyfriends/girlfriends, be they straight or gay, stay in the spare bed when they stay over. The parents know that they are busy banging each other senseless when they are outside of the home, off at college, or living in Dublin. But once they come back home it’s separate beds. It’s the way it works. It’s just an Irish thing.

Then finally, the rather patronizing suggestion that coming out to your parents is “a measure of quality time.” Yeah, because that’s what young people up and down the country look forward to. Not grief, distress, worry, shock and all of the other inherently negative reactions that protective parents react with when their beloved tells them they’re a homosexual in an overtly hostile heteronormative world. No, it’s “quality time”. Just throw on a few briquettes there and it will be fine.

You know what, they’re right. This ad is wrong.


After 535 days without a government, Belgium presents:


Elio de Rupo

The impasse-busting new Prime Minster of Belgium. Gay, socialist and Francophone, in a country which is predominantly conservative, right-wing and Dutch speaking. In fact, he doesn’t speak the language of 11 million of his countrymen (none of whom voted for him.) This will be interesting… Possibly the most interesting thing ever to happen in Belgium. Fact.

Interestingly, he’s the first gay PM in the European Union. He isn’t the first gay PM of a European country however. That accolade goes to everyone’s favourite lesbian granny, Joanna Sigurdardottir, of Iceland.


Not a bad year for the gays in America

Summed up by three pictures:

Phyllis Siegel, 76, left, and Connie Kopelov, 84, both of New York, embrace after becoming the first same-sex couple to get married at the Manhattan City Clerk’s office. (Wouldn’t your heart just melt!)

President Obama repeals Don’t Ask Don’t Tell
US gay service members march in a gay pride parade for the first time ever.
Obama promised that America would be a beacon to the world again. Well here we have it. Small steps, but life is getting better.

A higher standard?

There was a small media circus on North Great George’s Street today when David Norris bowed out of the Presidential election campaign. I’m not sure if I would have voted for Norris. Much of me felt that he was too much of a loose cannon, too likely to say the wrong thing at the wrong time. For example, his loudspoken views of Isreal have cost him dearly. (That’s all I’m saying, read into that what you like.) Could we really have had him in the Aras?

During the last ten years of the McAleese presidencies, the office of President has come to be seen as an embodiment of Ireland itself. Perhaps it’s the old Kathleen Ni Houlihan rubbish, but there was a touch of the “everyman (or in her case everywoman)” and the “Mother Ireland” about Mary McAleese. I think the longer she was in the job, the more fond that people became of her. We created a great sense of ownership of her. But what of Norris? Everyman and Mother Ireland; they are two accusations that could never have been leveled at him.

However, when asked would I vote for him, my answer tended be: “It depends on who else is running.” Neither yes nor no, but maybe. The decision would not be made on his merits, but on the merits of those he was running against. I think that was crucial. It really did depend on who else was going for it. Norris wasn’t my ideal candidate, but he might have been the best of a bad lot. It all boiled down to who the other contestants were.

I feel sorry for him, I genuinely do, especially after reading this piece by Fintan O’Toole, in which he highlights the hypocrisy of the situation. I also feel terribly disillusioned regarding Kathleen Lynch TD, who I have had the pleasure of debating against in the Hist and who I hold in very high regard. However, as Fintan points out, it’s just the way the Irish system works.

Overall, I think it’s a pity. The leaking of those letters this weekend, was a deliberate and successful effort to demolish David Norris’ campaign. Was this sorry spectacle necessary? Did enough people actually think that he could win? Was the threat of him winning so important as to make sure that he didn’t even make it on to the ballot paper?

Norris was, and still is, held in high regard by many people. Many people are very fond of him, and a great many people feel indebted to him. He is often referred to as a “National Teddy Bear”. But was he presidential material? Would he be able to connect with the Irish people? In truth, probably not. He lived in a bubble, consisting of Trinity College, Seanad Éireann, Joycean Dublin and North Great Georges St. All wonderful in their own right, but not exactly what you would call the read world. Although the media occasionally made a deal of his homosexuality, I don’t think that that would have mattered a toss to most of the voting public. (There isn’t a family in Ireland without a queer stashed away in it somewhere.) They have gays in Coronation Street now; gays can get married (well close enough, most straights think we can). The shock of Norris being a big puff had well and truly worn off.  Norris was always eccentric, ebullient, brash, theatrical but most of all, he was intellectual and posh. Very posh. West Britty posh. And I think that’s where he would have had the most trouble with the electorate. Intellectual is bad enough, look at poor Gareth Fitzgerald, and the trouble that people had keeping up with him. Posh however, is a class of alienation all to itself.

So unlike McAleese, Norris could never be the embodiment of Ireland. However, maybe that was a good thing. Maybe the Presidency needed to move in a new direction, and I think perhaps that’s why many people like me felt that we might vote for him, because he would bring it in a new direction. Perhaps, if he’d been let on to the ballot paper, Norris would have surprised us all and actually won the election. Alas, however, we shall never know.


That time of year again

No, not exams, Eurovision! Yes indeedy, this year Ireland once more enters the fray, boldly sending the Grimes Twins to to Dusseldorf, in a valiant attempt to regain her Eurovision crown and place it squarely (if such a thing were possible) on Jedward’s incredible coiffured locks.

So naturally Pantibar has risen to the occasion, giving the gays a reason for a hooley in the otherwise dry period (as if, I’ve yet to meet a sober homosexual!) between the AMI and Pride in the form of a glamtastic Eurovision spectacular. It’s based on Panti’s familiar theme of “putting some colour into your poor, dreary, grey lives…”

The brains behind Opus Gei have put this together, and it looks like a hoot. Now, if you’ll excuse me I’m off the learn the words to Gina G whilst practicing my hAon Dó Trís…


Fathers who love their gay sons

Often, it can be difficult for a parent, especially a father, so hear that his son is gay. This is not homophobia (i.e. an irrational fear of gay people), but rather a defensive parental instinct, as they do not fear homosexuality, but rather they fear that their child will suffer as a result of it. And no parent ever wants to see their child suffer.

It’s also important to remember, that when I came out in 2003 (eight years ago! How did that happen?) Ireland was a very different place. There simply were no gay role models. The only two gay men that anyone in Ireland knew were Senator David Norris and Elton John, and they could hardly be described as “normal”. Not only that, but civil partnership was so unrealistic, that one could only dream of it, and civil marriage was never going to happen. That meant that when I came out, my dad had no cultural references. I was only seventeen and he was pretty sure that I wasn’t a West Brit Joycean scholar, nor was a confidant of Lady Diana with a bad toupee. There was no framework, no role models; nothing for a parent to grasp onto, and therefore all the more difficult to understand.

Look what’s changed! I know that progress has been slow (too slow, some might argue) but Ireland has been transformed. As of this month, civil partnership is a reality, or in common speak (because Lord knows, the straights really don’t know the difference) – “gays can get married”; we now have not one, but two, openly gay TDs in the Dáil (and some others representing the constituency of Narnia); Intercounty GAA players (well, player) have come out. Suddenly Ireland is a land of fairies once more! (Not that it ever wasn’t, but at least people can see them again.)

But thinking back to 2003, when I came out, I can totally understand my father’s reaction. I think that most parents are world-wary. They see a cruel world, full of hatred and injustice and bigotry; people who will use  cruelty and terror just because you were “different”, and most parents will try and protect their children in the face of this. He was just being protective, and rightly so. I was still only seventeen, and despite thinking that I had it all figured out, I hadn’t. So I’m thankful to him for making me throw on the brakes a little.

Anyway, today I clicked on the Single Ladies American Football video from Glee, and I saw the particularly moving clip between Kurt and his father, which really struck home to me. I think that is a wonderful depiction of a father’s love. And that’s why I had a happy little cry in my kitchen.


Happy Gay Christmas

Right about now, the crowds should be taking their seats in the Grand Old Lady of Dame Street, and in a few minute’s time, the curtain will go up on the Alternative Miss Ireland 2011. This is the first year that I haven’t gone to the AMI; I’ve gone every year since starting college six years ago. I even entered an act when I was in third year. (Miss Information; a secondary school teacher specialising in Sex Ed and Singing).

Anyway,  this year I didn’t buy a ticket. Partly because they were expensive and money is tight. Also I wasn’t going out on the gay scene anymore, so my peer group weren’t going either. Granted, I had mooted the idea with several friends and toyed with the idea of going, but the consensus this year was that uptake was smaller than other years and it didn’t seem to have any of the momentum that it had had previously, so these efforts came to nothing. A group of us went last year, and whereas it was an enjoyable evening, it didn’t have the wow factor of previous shows and it worked out to be a very expensive night out.

This year, for the first time since I’ve started attending, it didn’t sell out. Tickets are still available, and on that basis I decided to rally at the eleventh hour  and get a cheap seat in the gods. Granted a cheap seat is still 30 euro, which isn’t cheap. This evening at 6pm, I managed to convince my housemate to abandon her plans for the evening in order to go, but that fell through and so it was finally decided that I would not be going to this year’s AMI. Maybe the break will do me good, maybe the hordes will be back for Gay Christmas with renewed vigour next March. Or perhaps, I will wake up tomorrow with the feeling that I’ve missed something special. However, there’s absolutely no point in fretting about it, so in the meantime let us celebrate Gay Christmas with this wonderful video of the Muppets doing Bohemian Rhapsody. (It’s a HD version, so go on, sit back, and put it on Full Screen. Treat yourself!)

Anyway, all that remains to be said is may the best queen win. The Queen is dead! Long live the queen!

 


I know where I’ll be on Paddy’s Day

Watching DUBC win the Gannon Cup.

But after that, I’ll probably go to Pantibar for some shenanigans. This ad was so funny, I nearly choked on me tea!


Listen up!

I spent the week before Christmas working in a large Dublin department store, and as the week went on there were more and more moments when I ended up thinking “I really am working in Grace Brothers”. That of course lead me on to this, so I bring you Mr. Humphries and this rather amazing exercise in British innuendo. Listen carefully, it’s all about what’s nearly being said.

And here is the obituary that appeared in the GCN in April of 2007, written by Stephen Meyler. I remember reading it at the time and being struck by how powerful it was, and I have returned to it a few times since. Therefore, in honour of Mr. Humphries, I think I should publish it here on the Legion.

John Inman, the actor who played the camp Mr Humphrys in the ‘70s BBC sitcom Are You Being Served? died last month, aged 71. He is survived by his partner of 33 years, who he ‘civil-unioned’ with in 2005. The show was one of the most popular the BBC ever had, running for seven seasons, with 22 million viewers at its peak. It was broadcast repeatedly around the world for years after the run, with the result that Mr Humphrys became one of the most visible gay characters of the era, despite former Grace Brothers’ colleague Wendy Richard claiming he just really loved his mother. His catchphrase, “I’m free!”, entered popular culture’s vocabulary and Inman parlayed Mr Humphrys’ success into decades of panto damehood, although later attempts with similar TV characters failed.

An old debate about whether such screamers are good or bad representations of (and for) the gay community was reawakened after Inman’s death. The arguments on either side seem to be age-related. For older gays, who were teenagers or young adults when the show first aired, there is a general warmth for Mr Humphrys. Yes, he was a mincing queen, always ready with an innuendo-laden quip and a flutter of the eyelids. But, the pro Humphrys camp points out, he was a respected member of the staff at Grace Brothers who got and gave as much slagging as anyone else, and he remained a central player in what was the most popular soap at that time. Within the fiction, his effete gay character was completely acceptable, unlike the reality outside the TV that most ‘70s gays were living. The character was unapologetically camp, revelling in it in fact. Despite the stereotype, the pro lobby regard him as an important step in the normalising of gay people.

Not so, counter the younger anti-Humphrys crew. They grew up in an era when gays were far more visible in the media, and gay issues were regularly aired and discussed there, and in their schools. For them, Mr Humphrys is a homophobic caricature of a bygone darker age, who at best, made queers ‘safe’ for an unchallenged mainstream culture to have a good old chuckle at, and at worst, served the purpose of dehumanising gays to make it easier to deny them respect and rights. He reinforced hatred and should be consigned to oblivion.

There’s an ‘internal’ aspect to these arguments about representation. It’s about how ‘gay’ characters, behaviours, statistics, etc. make gay people feel. A big poof being saucy about a pussy to his long-time colleagues once a week for seven years might provoke a young queer to think about what his sexuality is going to mean when he reveals it; it might show him the possibility of acceptance. On the other hand, it might drive him so far back into the closet that he’s touching wood; making the old queen Mr Humphrys your inner gay is probably not to everyone’s taste or ability. Of course, there’s also the small issue that most gay people would not be sexually attracted to Mr Humphrys.

Modern queers are naturally exasperated at being represented by such a crass caricature – they want the straight world to see us and accept us in all of our diversity, and Mr Humphrys is a big sparkly roadblock to that progress.

However, there’s an impression that this exasperation is also about having a problem with effeminate gay men. The antipathy towards Mr Humphrys assumes a very different aspect then; internally, it’s about gay men unable to accept that some of us are actually big screamers or that all gay men have something of the ‘feminine’ about them, no matter how many contact sports we play. It’s natural probably, after all our sexuality is about attraction to ‘masculine’ attributes such as large shoulder muscles or disguising emotion. What no one should forget, though, is that being straight-acting is as much a performance as Mr Humphrys’ ever was.

Stephen Meyler, April 2007.


Gaying it up a bit

You must be wondering how on earth this blog could possibly get gayer. Well it has. Embrace it.

More mischief from Mel Brooks.

What not to say in Berlin!

Last week I was in Berlin and I couldn’t get this tune of of my head. It’s from The Producers by Mel Brooks.

The funny thing is that if the war went the other way, it’s probably the type of musical theatre that would show in the West End. Albeit in that case, the comic element of Hitler being a big screaming Mary would probably not feature.
The dance routine is fantastic. They were much more daring with the 2005 re-make than with the original 1968 Gene Wilder film – although I suppose the passage of time and the healing of wounds had a lot to do with that.

N.B. I’ve just noticed that the singing stormtrooper is none other than John Barrowman. In one way, it’s very funny; in another it shows up just how sinister the homoerotic nature of the SS was. (As if that was the only sinister thing about the SS…)


Splitters!

It has been a source of much heartbreak for me that the Dublin Gay Theatre Festival has gone down the self-destructive road of a split. It means that this May there will be two rival theatre festivals, both with astonishingly similar names – the Absolut Dublin Gay Theatre Festival and the International Dublin Gay Theatre Festival – both competing for the same audience and both being nasty and bitchy to one another.

I have had some wonderful times volunteering for the Gay Theatre Festival (the original, before the split) and it is upsetting for me to think that something that was once so wonderful, has now become a negative force within our city.
On the upside however, some smartarse (who subsequently turned out to be Will Saint Ledger) on Facebook has set up the Gay Peoples’ Theatre Front as a pisstake on the whole situation. I think it’s bang on and feckin’ hilarious!

I never thought I’d be getting dressing tips from Sue Sylvestor.

Gerry Claffey, this one is especially for you.


Visit Britain

Two old poofs have been turned away from a B&B in Berkshire, on the basis that they were two old poofs. (I know, people having sex at that age! Perish the thought!) Apparently the B&B owner was a Christian and the idea of having Sodom and Gemorrah in her upstairs bedroom was just too much to stomach.

On the one hand, I can agree with the owner. It is here family home that she is opening up and therefore she should have some degree of choice in who she admits. At the same time, refusing someone on the basis of their sexuality is the same as refusing them on the basis of gender or on the colour of their skin – so that is intrinsically wrong. I suppose the core issue here is that the woman has taken the Christian belief and let it interfere with her common sense. Jesus said to “love thy neighbour”. Well John loves Michael, surely Mrs Wilkenson can’t have a problem with that.

 

 


Gleeful indulgance